Aaron Parnas Is Killing Journalism
Acting as a human version of AI summaries damages the very same journalism industry Parnas uses to make bank.
We have some very serious news right now: Aaron Parnas is killing journalism.
Never heard of him? Parnas has millions of social media followers and over 635,000 Substack subscribers. He is ranked first on Substack in the “News” category. Tens of thousands of paid subscribers pay Parnas (likely to the tune of a million dollars annually) to summarize the work of actual journalists, often without giving those journalists any credit.
From Columbia Journalism Review:
If Parnas is doing half as well as, say, Matthew Yglesias—the former Vox blogger, who has said that he has eighteen thousand paying subscribers out of more than two hundred thousand readers, which delivers him a salary above a million dollars a year—he could be making bank.
I reviewed Parnas’ recent videos and Substack posts and found the same pattern again and again—he rarely credits his sources. In a recent, typical Substack post, he summarized eighteen separate news items and credited only one, without even providing a hyperlink to let readers verify the reporting or support the original outlet.
This matters because what Parnas is doing has the same destructive effect on journalism as AI-powered summaries, which are draining publishers of traffic, revenue, and audience engagement at a moment when journalism is hanging by a thread.
Journalism, Democracy’s Immune System, Has Already Lost Over Half Its Workforce Since 2008
The journalism industry is in freefall. According to a review by Pew Research of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, “newsroom employment at U.S. newspapers dropped by about half between 2008 and 2019.”
When journalists disappear, so does investigative reporting, local accountability, government transparency, and the public’s ability to make informed decisions. Research indicates that our democratic society cannot function properly without journalism.
The book Democracy’s Detectives: The Economics of Investigative Journalism by economist James T. Hamilton details how every dollar spent on investigative journalism produces hundreds of dollars in public benefit by exposing corruption & keeping an eye on government spending.
Journalists are a democracy’s immune system. They alert us to dangers, root out waste, and strengthen our communities. On top of all that, they make us better citizens.
Studies show that civic engagement increases where local news is strong - more people vote. Residents are more likely to contact their representatives and get involved with community groups. The public hold their elected officials accountable because they know more about them. Elected officials are more attentive to their constituents needs because they know they’re being watched. Journalism changes the way people vote and reduces polarization. Strong local news means communities rely less on the sensational, partisan biases blasted to them on cable news and social media.
How AI Summaries Are Destroying the News Business
AI-generated “zero-click searches” are accelerating the journalism industry’s demise by collapsing the traffic ecosystem that newsrooms rely on to sustain themselves. A zero-click search happens when someone enters a query and search engines like Google supply the answer directly on the results page, eliminating the need to click through to any website.
A Wall Street Journal report documented steep declines in publisher traffic following Google’s rollout of AI Overviews.
Further data confirms the damage:
• Most publishers saw Google referral traffic fall 1% to 25% soon after AI Overviews launched (per Digiday)
• Pew Research found that when AI summaries appeared in Google results, only 8% of users clicked a news source, compared with 15% when no summary appeared.
• Market analyses show zero-click searches now comprise around 60% of all searches, and AI Overviews more than doubled in frequency in 2025:
News publishers depend on those clicks for ad revenue, subscriber conversion, time-on-site, and audience loyalty. When AI takes the clicks away, funding disappears.
Journalism cannot survive parasitic models that siphon audience attention away from original reporting. By effectively serving as a human AI summary, Parnas is perpetuating these same dynamics.
Parnas Is a Human Zero-Click Summary Machine
Parnas doesn’t just summarize the news. He replaces it.
He gives readers condensed versions of real reporters’ work without directing them back to the journalists who did the investigation, verification, and fact-gathering required to produce the news in the first place. And based on the comments in reply to the social media videos I made about this, Parnas’ audience seems to think the journalism we need to make better decisions at the ballot box would somehow exist…without journalists?
The majority of the stories he has reported on his Substack over the past year have not credited the original source. In recent posts, Parnas summarized exclusive reporting by The Guardian and corporate newsrooms like NBC News without credit. He summarized a Minnesota “Operation Creep” sting story originally reported by the local affiliates of corporate outlets like CBS, again with no credit.
Journalism Can’t Survive This And the Grift Makes It Worse
Parnas has a profitable grift.
On Substack, Parnas regularly positions himself as America’s last line of defense, claiming corporate media refuses to report the stories that matter. But his business model depends on repackaging corporate media reporting, then asking people to pay him instead of journalists.
If he prominently credited his sources, hyperlinked to real journalists, and encouraged people to support the newsrooms doing the work, his ruse of bashing corporate media while repurposing their work for profit would fall apart. His audience would see how much he relies on the very reporters he tells them to distrust.
It’s great that Aaron is getting more news to more people. But he’s attacking the free press while hiding his sources. He must do better. If you’re a fan of Parnas demand that he hyperlink every story he summarizes. Ask him to fight for the journalism that is making him rich.
There Is an Ethical Alternative
I understand why people follow Parnas. He’s quick. He’s digestible. He saves people time. He’s getting important news to lots of people in a way that works for them.
And it’s true that corporate media normalizes Trump’s corruption and coup attempt in exchange for access. But corporate newsrooms also employ hard-working journalists, your neighbors and fellow citizens, who serve as some of the last bastions of essential reporting we need to fight back. We need all of journalism, including corporate newsrooms with the resources to do high quality investigations, to help us hold the powerful to account.
Journalism needs its audience back. And democracy requires journalism.
If you want a feed that supports newsrooms rather than draining them, check out my Bluesky lists. They’re full of pro-democracy, fact-based non-profit and independent newsrooms reporting in the public interest. Pissed about paywalls? Check out my piece, Defeat Fascism With These Paywall-Free, Fact-Based National Newsrooms.
Subscribe to these outlets. Donate to them. Amplify their stories on your social media feeds.
My Mission
My mission is simple: get Americans to follow, support, and spread the work of pro-democracy, fact-based newsrooms reporting in the public interest. By flooding the zone with public interest journalism, we push back on the billionaire strategy of “flooding the zone” with outrage and disinformation. By amplifying journalism, we save democracy.
Support My Work
But this work takes time, research, and resources—and it relies on reader support. As an independent journalist, I’m the only one fighting for you, for truth, and for democracy. I don’t have a corporate boss or a political agenda to sell. And I’ll never leave your side. But this work can’t be done without your subscription. It keeps the truth alive. (See what I did there?)
Share this article right now.
And check out (and share) the videos I made about Parnas below:
Tiktok failed to load.Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
Tiktok failed to load.Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
I livestream most weekday afternoons on TikTok (3:30pm ET). Watch my videos about information nutrition on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram.
Mmmmm. Thanks. I like Parnas. It’s quick concise and timely. I do read the stories from the sources.
BUT this man has a point.
Thank you for this. I he’s in my feed a lot and I knew he was problematic, but this makes me pause a lot. I appreciate the alternative resources on BlueSky! Proud and humble paid subscriber here. Appreciate you!